13 July 2023
On July 10th, MPs took to Westminster Hall to debate a new national policy to mandate Swift bricks in new housing, a move which would throw a lifeline to Swifts and 4 other threatened urban species. The debate followed widespread public support for a petition highlighting the rapid decline of Swifts and offering a rollout of Swift bricks as a targeted solution.
Swifts are an urban bird species that is currently red listed in the UK after experiencing a severe population decline of 62%. One driver of their decline is likely to be the loss of suitable nesting sites in both old and new buildings. Swift bricks are durable, low-cost and no-maintenance solutions that can be integrated at scale to provide ideal nests for Swifts. When Swift bricks are included in new housing developments or retrofitted into existing estates, all the evidence shows that they are beneficial not only for Swifts, but other wildlife, including other red-listed bird species.
MPs from across the political spectrum, including prominent Species Champions, contributed to the debate and there was unanimous cross-party support for the mandating of Swift bricks in new developments. Species Champions Kerry McCarthy (Swift), Robert Courts (Cuckoo), Caroline Lucas (Round-Headed Rampion) and Caroline Nokes (Duke of Burgundy Butterfly) all delivered impassioned speeches and interventions.
The prevailing theme of the debate was that mandating Swift bricks is a simple, low-cost solution that can have a huge impact on Swifts with minimal effort. Furthermore, despite being a red-listed species, Swifts are not currently covered by any legal requirement for local authorities to consider them as part of their biodiversity duty and as Swift bricks are not covered in biodiversity net gain metrics developers have no incentive to incorporate them in their buildings.
Unfortunately, the Government response to the debate was that it does not intend, at present, to make Swift bricks mandatory in new housing. They believe that we need to be cautious when it comes to mandating national planning conditions and that they do not wish to impose additional and potentially unreasonable requirements on developers or local authorities.
You can watch the full debate here.